
Selected publications
This page highlights a few publications by Aute Kasdorp in both English and Dutch (further below). It includes some peer reviewed scholarly papers as well as a selection of noted policy-oriented work that is available to the public. Click on each image to access the corresponding publication.
This paper provides regulators who seek to (further) develop a risk-based supervision approach with a framework to systematically assess their current position and future options. A range of self analysis questions and practical examples guide regulators towards sensible design choices, given their particular context. The paper is focused on financial consumer protection regulators, but is equally valuable for regulators in other domains.
Between Scylla and Charybdis
Ph.D Thesis
Regulators frequently come across harmful but legal organisational conduct. Remarkably, almost all regulators undertake supervisory interventions to counteract such conduct. This dissertation provides insight into why and how. It also discusses to what extent this supervisory practice can be legitimate.
Ambiguous Signaling in Regulatory Conversations
Scholarly paper
This case study investigates interactions between inspectors and regulatee representatives during regulatory conversations. We identify ambiguity as a central characteristic of these regulatory conversations. Analysing discrepancies in terms of relationship types and associated relational signals helps explain and prevent suboptimal communication and reduced acceptance of regulators’ demands by regulatees.
How to improve the OECD Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit
Policy recommendation
In response to OECD's invitation, Supervision Strategy issued 4 recommendations (substantiated by
examples) to improve the OECD Enforcement and Inspections Toolkit: i) add technical nuances,
ii) acknowledge realistic limitations, iii) balance its political stance, and iv) elaborate its analytical foundation.
Regulatory Intervention beyond the Law
Scholarly paper
Regulators increasingly counteract harmful but legal corporate conduct. This paper outlines four types of regulators with an increasingly extensive attitude towards such interventions: Law Enforcer, Legislative Agent, Social Broker, and Public Architect.
Geef toezichthouders ook kaders voor hun buitenwettelijk toezicht
Opiniërend artikel
Dit artikel geeft een indruk van het informele machtsspel tussen de AFM en de banken, daar waar de AFM geen wettelijke grondslag heeft (buitenwettelijk toezicht). Het artikel belicht voor- en nadelen van dergelijk toezicht en pleit voor een beleidskader om de de legitimiteit van buitenwettelijk toezicht te vergroten.